token.app › Compare › Qwen3.6 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Qwen3.6 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 1.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.6 Flash | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | DeepSeek |
| Input $/1M | $0.188 | $0.150 |
| Output $/1M | $1.13 | $0.600 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.422 | $0.262 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 66K | 393K |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Open weights |
Choose Qwen3.6 Flash if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $0.422 blended
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.6 Flash or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.6 Flash and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.6 Flash cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $0.422 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.188 vs $0.150. Output alone: $1.13 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Qwen3.6 Flash and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Qwen3.6 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.6 Flash and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Qwen3.6 Flash is made by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.