token.app › Compare › Qwen3.6 Flash vs GLM 5.2
Qwen3.6 Flash vs GLM 5.2
GLM 5.2 leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. GLM 5.2 is 1.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GLM 5.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.6 Flash | GLM 5.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Zhipu AI |
| Input $/1M | $0.188 | $0.252 |
| Output $/1M | $1.13 | $0.792 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.422 | $0.387 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 66K | 128K |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Jun 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Open weights |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 91.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 21.2% | 38.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 84.4% | 86.4% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Qwen3.6 Flash if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose GLM 5.2 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.387 vs $0.422 blended
- Higher GPQA Diamond (91.9% vs 83.3%)
- Higher SimpleQA Verified (38.1% vs 21.2%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (86.4% vs 84.4%)
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
- Newer model (released Jun 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.6 Flash or GLM 5.2?
Across the 3 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Qwen3.6 Flash leads on 0 and GLM 5.2 leads on 3. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Qwen3.6 Flash cheaper than GLM 5.2?
GLM 5.2 is cheaper: $0.387 versus $0.422 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.188 vs $0.252. Output alone: $1.13 vs $0.792.
What context windows do Qwen3.6 Flash and GLM 5.2 have?
Qwen3.6 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens. GLM 5.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.6 Flash and GLM 5.2?
Qwen3.6 Flash is made by Alibaba. GLM 5.2 is made by Zhipu AI.