token.app › Compare › Qwen3.6 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna
Qwen3.6 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna
GPT-5.6 Luna leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. GPT-5.6 Luna is 1.9× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-5.6 Luna accepts the larger context window (1.1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.6 Flash | GPT-5.6 Luna | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | OpenAI |
| Input $/1M | $0.188 | $0.100 |
| Output $/1M | $1.13 | $0.600 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.422 | $0.225 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.1M |
| Max output | 66K | 128K |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 91.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 21.2% | 41.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 84.4% | 98.3% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Qwen3.6 Flash if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…
- Costs less per token — $0.225 vs $0.422 blended
- Higher GPQA Diamond (91.6% vs 83.3%)
- Higher SimpleQA Verified (41.7% vs 21.2%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (98.3% vs 84.4%)
- Larger context window (1.1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.6 Flash or GPT-5.6 Luna?
Across the 3 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Qwen3.6 Flash leads on 0 and GPT-5.6 Luna leads on 3. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Qwen3.6 Flash cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper: $0.225 versus $0.422 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.188 vs $0.100. Output alone: $1.13 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Qwen3.6 Flash and GPT-5.6 Luna have?
Qwen3.6 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.6 Flash and GPT-5.6 Luna?
Qwen3.6 Flash is made by Alibaba. GPT-5.6 Luna is made by OpenAI.