token.app โ€บ Compare โ€บ Qwen3.6 Flash vs Grok 4.5

Qwen3.6 Flash vs Grok 4.5

Grok 4.5 leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.6 Flash is 7.1ร— cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.6 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3.6 FlashGrok 4.5
ProviderAlibabaxAI
Input $/1M$0.188$2.00
Output $/1M$1.13$6.00
Blended $/1M$0.422$3.00
Context window1M500K
Max output66Kโ€”
ReleasedApr 2026Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
GPQA Diamond 83.3% 93.4%
SimpleQA Verified 21.2% 53.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 84.4% 97.8%
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Qwen3.6 Flash ifโ€ฆ
  • Costs less per token โ€” $0.422 vs $3.00 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
Choose Grok 4.5 ifโ€ฆ
  • Higher GPQA Diamond (93.4% vs 83.3%)
  • Higher SimpleQA Verified (53.5% vs 21.2%)
  • Higher OTIS Mock AIME (97.8% vs 84.4%)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.6 Flash or Grok 4.5?
Across the 3 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Qwen3.6 Flash leads on 0 and Grok 4.5 leads on 3. Benchmarks are one input โ€” price and context window are on this page too.
Is Qwen3.6 Flash cheaper than Grok 4.5?
Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper: $0.422 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.188 vs $2.00. Output alone: $1.13 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.6 Flash and Grok 4.5 have?
Qwen3.6 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens. Grok 4.5: 500,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.6 Flash and Grok 4.5?
Qwen3.6 Flash is made by Alibaba. Grok 4.5 is made by xAI.
Related comparisons