token.app › Compare › Qwen3.7 Flash vs Grok 4.5
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Grok 4.5
Qwen3.7 Flash is 55× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.7 Flash | Grok 4.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | xAI |
| Input $/1M | $0.030 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $0.130 | $6.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.055 | $3.00 |
| Context window | 1M | 500K |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Released | Jul 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $3.00 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
Choose Grok 4.5 if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.7 Flash or Grok 4.5?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.7 Flash and Grok 4.5, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.7 Flash cheaper than Grok 4.5?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.030 vs $2.00. Output alone: $0.130 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.7 Flash and Grok 4.5 have?
Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens. Grok 4.5: 500,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.7 Flash and Grok 4.5?
Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba. Grok 4.5 is made by xAI.