token.app › Compare › Qwen3.7 Flash vs Grok 4.6
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Grok 4.6
Grok 4.6 leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Flash is 55× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.7 Flash | Grok 4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | SpaceXAI |
| Input $/1M | $0.030 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $0.130 | $6.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.055 | $3.00 |
| Context window | 1M | 500K |
| Max output | 66K | 450K |
| Released | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| GPQA Diamond | 82.3% | 94.0% |
| FrontierMath T1–3 | 19.3% | 66.0% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 86.7% | 99.2% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $3.00 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
Choose Grok 4.6 if…
- Higher GPQA Diamond (94.0% vs 82.3%)
- Higher FrontierMath T1–3 (66.0% vs 19.3%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (99.2% vs 86.7%)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.7 Flash or Grok 4.6?
Across the 3 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Qwen3.7 Flash leads on 0 and Grok 4.6 leads on 3. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Qwen3.7 Flash cheaper than Grok 4.6?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.030 vs $2.00. Output alone: $0.130 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.7 Flash and Grok 4.6 have?
Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens. Grok 4.6: 500,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.7 Flash and Grok 4.6?
Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba. Grok 4.6 is made by SpaceXAI.