token.app › Compare › Qwen3.7 Max vs GLM 5.2
Qwen3.7 Max vs GLM 5.2
Qwen3.7 Max leads on 4 of 6 shared benchmarks. GLM 5.2 is 5.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GLM 5.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.7 Max | GLM 5.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Zhipu AI |
| Input $/1M | $1.48 | $0.252 |
| Output $/1M | $4.42 | $0.792 |
| Blended $/1M | $2.21 | $0.387 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 131K | 128K |
| Released | May 2026 | Jun 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Open weights |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.9% | 91.9% |
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.3% | 78.7% |
| FrontierMath T1–3 | 64.6% | 59.2% |
| FrontierMath T4 | 34.1% | 29.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 58.5% | 38.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 95.6% | 86.4% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Qwen3.7 Max if…
- Higher FrontierMath T1–3 (64.6% vs 59.2%)
- Higher FrontierMath T4 (34.1% vs 29.3%)
- Higher SimpleQA Verified (58.5% vs 38.1%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (95.6% vs 86.4%)
Choose GLM 5.2 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.387 vs $2.21 blended
- Higher GPQA Diamond (91.9% vs 90.9%)
- Higher SWE-bench Verified (78.7% vs 77.3%)
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
- Newer model (released Jun 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.7 Max or GLM 5.2?
Across the 6 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Qwen3.7 Max leads on 4 and GLM 5.2 leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Qwen3.7 Max cheaper than GLM 5.2?
GLM 5.2 is cheaper: $0.387 versus $2.21 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.48 vs $0.252. Output alone: $4.42 vs $0.792.
What context windows do Qwen3.7 Max and GLM 5.2 have?
Qwen3.7 Max: 1,000,000 tokens. GLM 5.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.7 Max and GLM 5.2?
Qwen3.7 Max is made by Alibaba. GLM 5.2 is made by Zhipu AI.