token.app › Compare › Qwen3.7 Max vs GPT-5.6 Luna
Qwen3.7 Max vs GPT-5.6 Luna
GPT-5.6 Luna leads on 4 of 5 shared benchmarks. GPT-5.6 Luna is 9.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-5.6 Luna accepts the larger context window (1.1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.7 Max | GPT-5.6 Luna | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | OpenAI |
| Input $/1M | $1.48 | $0.100 |
| Output $/1M | $4.42 | $0.600 |
| Blended $/1M | $2.21 | $0.225 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.1M |
| Max output | 131K | 128K |
| Released | May 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.9% | 91.6% |
| FrontierMath T1–3 | 64.6% | 82.1% |
| FrontierMath T4 | 34.1% | 61.0% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 58.5% | 41.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 95.6% | 98.3% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Qwen3.7 Max if…
- Higher SimpleQA Verified (58.5% vs 41.7%)
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…
- Costs less per token — $0.225 vs $2.21 blended
- Higher GPQA Diamond (91.6% vs 90.9%)
- Higher FrontierMath T1–3 (82.1% vs 64.6%)
- Higher FrontierMath T4 (61.0% vs 34.1%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (98.3% vs 95.6%)
- Larger context window (1.1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.7 Max or GPT-5.6 Luna?
Across the 5 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Qwen3.7 Max leads on 1 and GPT-5.6 Luna leads on 4. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Qwen3.7 Max cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper: $0.225 versus $2.21 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.48 vs $0.100. Output alone: $4.42 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Qwen3.7 Max and GPT-5.6 Luna have?
Qwen3.7 Max: 1,000,000 tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.7 Max and GPT-5.6 Luna?
Qwen3.7 Max is made by Alibaba. GPT-5.6 Luna is made by OpenAI.