token.app › Compare › Qwen3.8 Flash vs Grok 4.6

Qwen3.8 Flash vs Grok 4.6

Qwen3.8 Flash is 13× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.8 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3.8 FlashGrok 4.6
ProviderAlibabaSpaceXAI
Input $/1M$0.150$2.00
Output $/1M$0.470$6.00
Blended $/1M$0.230$3.00
Context window1M500K
Max output131K450K
ReleasedAug 2026Aug 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3.8 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.230 vs $3.00 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
Choose Grok 4.6 if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.8 Flash or Grok 4.6?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.8 Flash and Grok 4.6, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.8 Flash cheaper than Grok 4.6?
Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper: $0.230 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $2.00. Output alone: $0.470 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.8 Flash and Grok 4.6 have?
Qwen3.8 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens. Grok 4.6: 500,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.8 Flash and Grok 4.6?
Qwen3.8 Flash is made by Alibaba. Grok 4.6 is made by SpaceXAI.
Related comparisons