token.app › Compare › Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 8.9× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.500$0.090
Output $/1M$2.50$0.180
Blended $/1M$1.00$0.113
Context window200K1.0M
Max output64K384K
ReleasedOct 2025Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.113 vs $1.00 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper: $0.113 versus $1.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.500 vs $0.090. Output alone: $2.50 vs $0.180.
What context windows do Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 have?
Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch): 200,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) is made by Anthropic. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) full details DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 full details Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2 Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Inkling Small Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash