token.app › Compare › Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is 1.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Input $/1M$0.500$0.300
Output $/1M$2.50$2.50
Blended $/1M$1.00$0.850
Context window200K1.0M
Max output64K66K
ReleasedOct 2025Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.850 vs $1.00 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper: $0.850 versus $1.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.500 vs $0.300. Output alone: $2.50 vs $2.50.
What context windows do Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite have?
Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch): 200,000 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) is made by Anthropic. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is made by Google.
Related comparisons
Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) full details Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite full details Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Flint (free) Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Glimpse Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B