token.app › Compare › Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 18× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.500$0.030
Output $/1M$2.50$0.130
Blended $/1M$1.00$0.055
Context window200K1M
Max output64K66K
ReleasedOct 2025Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $1.00 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $1.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.500 vs $0.030. Output alone: $2.50 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch): 200,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) is made by Anthropic. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons
Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) full details Qwen3.7 Flash full details Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2 Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Inkling Small