token.app › Compare › Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 2.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Haiku 5.5Beam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderAnthropicReflection
Input $/1M$0.100$0.250
Output $/1M$0.500$1.00
Blended $/1M$0.200$0.438
Context window1M1.0M
Max output128K131K
ReleasedOct 2026Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.200 vs $0.438 blended
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper: $0.200 versus $0.438 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs $0.250. Output alone: $0.500 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Claude Haiku 5.5 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is made by Anthropic. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons