token.app › Compare › Claude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Claude Haiku 5.5 is 1.3× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Input $/1M | $0.100 | $0.150 |
| Output $/1M | $0.500 | $0.600 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.200 | $0.262 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 128K | 393K |
| Released | Oct 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Open weights |
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.200 vs $0.262 blended
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Haiku 5.5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Haiku 5.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper: $0.200 versus $0.262 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs $0.150. Output alone: $0.500 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Claude Haiku 5.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Claude Haiku 5.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is made by Anthropic. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons