token.app › Compare › Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) vs Qwen3.8 Max

Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max is 1.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Opus 4.7 (batch)Qwen3.8 Max
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba
Input $/1M$2.50$2.00
Output $/1M$12.50$6.00
Blended $/1M$5.00$3.00
Context window1M1M
Max output128K131K
ReleasedApr 2026Aug 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.8 Max if…
  • Costs less per token — $3.00 vs $5.00 blended
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) or Qwen3.8 Max?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) and Qwen3.8 Max, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max?
Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper: $3.00 versus $5.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.50 vs $2.00. Output alone: $12.50 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) and Qwen3.8 Max have?
Claude Opus 4.7 (batch): 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) and Qwen3.8 Max?
Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) is made by Anthropic. Qwen3.8 Max is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons
Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) full details Qwen3.8 Max full details Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2 Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) vs Inkling Small Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash