token.app › Compare › Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is 3.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Input $/1M$1.50$0.300
Output $/1M$7.50$2.50
Blended $/1M$3.00$0.850
Context window1M1.0M
Max output128K66K
ReleasedFeb 2026Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.850 vs $3.00 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper: $0.850 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.50 vs $0.300. Output alone: $7.50 vs $2.50.
What context windows do Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite have?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch): 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) is made by Anthropic. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is made by Google.
Related comparisons
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) full details Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite full details Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Flint (free) Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Glimpse Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B