token.app › Compare › Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Gemini 3.7 Flash is 2.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)Gemini 3.7 Flash
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Input $/1M$1.50$0.750
Output $/1M$7.50$3.75
Blended $/1M$3.00$1.50
Context window1M1.0M
Max output128K66K
ReleasedFeb 2026Aug 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $1.50 vs $3.00 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) or Gemini 3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) and Gemini 3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) cheaper than Gemini 3.7 Flash?
Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper: $1.50 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.50 vs $0.750. Output alone: $7.50 vs $3.75.
What context windows do Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) and Gemini 3.7 Flash have?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch): 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) and Gemini 3.7 Flash?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) is made by Anthropic. Gemini 3.7 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) full details Gemini 3.7 Flash full details Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Flint (free) Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Glimpse Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B