token.app › Compare › Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna is 13× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-5.6 Luna accepts the larger context window (1.1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)GPT-5.6 Luna
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input $/1M$1.50$0.100
Output $/1M$7.50$0.600
Blended $/1M$3.00$0.225
Context window1M1.1M
Max output128K128K
ReleasedFeb 2026Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.225 vs $3.00 blended
  • Larger context window (1.1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) or GPT-5.6 Luna?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) and GPT-5.6 Luna, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper: $0.225 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.50 vs $0.100. Output alone: $7.50 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) and GPT-5.6 Luna have?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch): 1,000,000 tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens.
Who makes Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) and GPT-5.6 Luna?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) is made by Anthropic. GPT-5.6 Luna is made by OpenAI.
Related comparisons
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) full details GPT-5.6 Luna full details Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Inkling Small