token.app › Compare › Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 is 1.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Muse Spark 1.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)Muse Spark 1.2
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Input $/1M$1.50$1.25
Output $/1M$7.50$4.25
Blended $/1M$3.00$2.00
Context window1M1.0M
Max output128K—
ReleasedFeb 2026Aug 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if…
  • Costs less per token — $2.00 vs $3.00 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) or Muse Spark 1.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) and Muse Spark 1.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2?
Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper: $2.00 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.50 vs $1.25. Output alone: $7.50 vs $4.25.
What context windows do Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) and Muse Spark 1.2 have?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch): 1,000,000 tokens. Muse Spark 1.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) and Muse Spark 1.2?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) is made by Anthropic. Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta.
Related comparisons
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) full details Muse Spark 1.2 full details Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Inkling Small Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash