token.app › Compare › Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 55× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba
Input $/1M$1.50$0.030
Output $/1M$7.50$0.130
Blended $/1M$3.00$0.055
Context window1M1M
Max output128K66K
ReleasedFeb 2026Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $3.00 blended
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.50 vs $0.030. Output alone: $7.50 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch): 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) is made by Anthropic. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) full details Qwen3.7 Flash full details Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Inkling Small