token.app › Compare › Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Claude Opus 5

Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Claude Opus 5

Codestral 2508 (batch) is 44× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Claude Opus 5 accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Codestral 2508 (batch)Claude Opus 5
ProviderMistral AIAnthropic
Input $/1M$0.150$5.00
Output $/1M$0.450$25.00
Blended $/1M$0.225$10.00
Context window256K1M
Max output205K128K
ReleasedAug 2025Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Codestral 2508 (batch) if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.225 vs $10.00 blended
Choose Claude Opus 5 if…
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Codestral 2508 (batch) or Claude Opus 5?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Codestral 2508 (batch) and Claude Opus 5, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Codestral 2508 (batch) cheaper than Claude Opus 5?
Codestral 2508 (batch) is cheaper: $0.225 versus $10.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $5.00. Output alone: $0.450 vs $25.00.
What context windows do Codestral 2508 (batch) and Claude Opus 5 have?
Codestral 2508 (batch): 256,000 tokens. Claude Opus 5: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Codestral 2508 (batch) and Claude Opus 5?
Codestral 2508 (batch) is made by Mistral AI. Claude Opus 5 is made by Anthropic.
Related comparisons
Codestral 2508 (batch) full details Claude Opus 5 full details Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Flint (free) Codestral 2508 (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Codestral 2508 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Glimpse Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B