token.app › Compare › Codestral 2508 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Codestral 2508 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Codestral 2508 (batch) is 1.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Codestral 2508 (batch)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderMistral AIDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.150$0.150
Output $/1M$0.450$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.225$0.262
Context window256K1.0M
Max output205K393K
ReleasedAug 2025Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Codestral 2508 (batch) if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.225 vs $0.262 blended
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Codestral 2508 (batch) or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Codestral 2508 (batch) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Codestral 2508 (batch) cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Codestral 2508 (batch) is cheaper: $0.225 versus $0.262 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $0.150. Output alone: $0.450 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Codestral 2508 (batch) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Codestral 2508 (batch): 256,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Codestral 2508 (batch) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Codestral 2508 (batch) is made by Mistral AI. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Codestral 2508 (batch) full details DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Flint (free) Codestral 2508 (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Glimpse Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Mercury 3