token.app › Compare › Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Mercury 3

Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Mercury 3

Mercury 3 is 1.4× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Mercury 3 accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Codestral 2508 (batch)Mercury 3
ProviderMistral AIInception
Input $/1M$0.150$0.100
Output $/1M$0.450$0.350
Blended $/1M$0.225$0.163
Context window256K1M
Max output205K131K
ReleasedAug 2025Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Codestral 2508 (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Mercury 3 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.163 vs $0.225 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Codestral 2508 (batch) or Mercury 3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Codestral 2508 (batch) and Mercury 3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Codestral 2508 (batch) cheaper than Mercury 3?
Mercury 3 is cheaper: $0.163 versus $0.225 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $0.100. Output alone: $0.450 vs $0.350.
What context windows do Codestral 2508 (batch) and Mercury 3 have?
Codestral 2508 (batch): 256,000 tokens. Mercury 3: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Codestral 2508 (batch) and Mercury 3?
Codestral 2508 (batch) is made by Mistral AI. Mercury 3 is made by Inception.
Related comparisons
Codestral 2508 (batch) full details Mercury 3 full details Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Flint (free) Codestral 2508 (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Codestral 2508 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Glimpse Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B