token.app › Compare › Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Codestral 2508 (batch) is 3.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Codestral 2508 (batch)Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ProviderMistral AIGoogle
Input $/1M$0.150$0.300
Output $/1M$0.450$2.50
Blended $/1M$0.225$0.850
Context window256K1.0M
Max output205K66K
ReleasedAug 2025Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Codestral 2508 (batch) if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.225 vs $0.850 blended
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Codestral 2508 (batch) or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Codestral 2508 (batch) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Codestral 2508 (batch) cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Codestral 2508 (batch) is cheaper: $0.225 versus $0.850 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $0.300. Output alone: $0.450 vs $2.50.
What context windows do Codestral 2508 (batch) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite have?
Codestral 2508 (batch): 256,000 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Codestral 2508 (batch) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Codestral 2508 (batch) is made by Mistral AI. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is made by Google.
Related comparisons
Codestral 2508 (batch) full details Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite full details Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Flint (free) Codestral 2508 (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Codestral 2508 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Glimpse Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B