token.app › Compare › Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Codestral 2508 (batch) is 6.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Codestral 2508 (batch)Gemini 3.7 Flash
ProviderMistral AIGoogle
Input $/1M$0.150$0.750
Output $/1M$0.450$3.75
Blended $/1M$0.225$1.50
Context window256K1.0M
Max output205K66K
ReleasedAug 2025Aug 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Codestral 2508 (batch) if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.225 vs $1.50 blended
Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Codestral 2508 (batch) or Gemini 3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Codestral 2508 (batch) and Gemini 3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Codestral 2508 (batch) cheaper than Gemini 3.7 Flash?
Codestral 2508 (batch) is cheaper: $0.225 versus $1.50 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $0.750. Output alone: $0.450 vs $3.75.
What context windows do Codestral 2508 (batch) and Gemini 3.7 Flash have?
Codestral 2508 (batch): 256,000 tokens. Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Codestral 2508 (batch) and Gemini 3.7 Flash?
Codestral 2508 (batch) is made by Mistral AI. Gemini 3.7 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons
Codestral 2508 (batch) full details Gemini 3.7 Flash full details Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Flint (free) Codestral 2508 (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Codestral 2508 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Glimpse Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B