token.app › Compare › Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Inkling Small

Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Inkling Small

Codestral 2508 (batch) is 2.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling Small accepts the larger context window (524K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Codestral 2508 (batch)Inkling Small
ProviderMistral AIThinkingmachines
Input $/1M$0.150$0.450
Output $/1M$0.450$1.20
Blended $/1M$0.225$0.637
Context window256K524K
Max output205K262K
ReleasedAug 2025Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Codestral 2508 (batch) if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.225 vs $0.637 blended
Choose Inkling Small if…
  • Larger context window (524K)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Codestral 2508 (batch) or Inkling Small?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Codestral 2508 (batch) and Inkling Small, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Codestral 2508 (batch) cheaper than Inkling Small?
Codestral 2508 (batch) is cheaper: $0.225 versus $0.637 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $0.450. Output alone: $0.450 vs $1.20.
What context windows do Codestral 2508 (batch) and Inkling Small have?
Codestral 2508 (batch): 256,000 tokens. Inkling Small: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Codestral 2508 (batch) and Inkling Small?
Codestral 2508 (batch) is made by Mistral AI. Inkling Small is made by Thinkingmachines.
Related comparisons
Codestral 2508 (batch) full details Inkling Small full details Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Flint (free) Codestral 2508 (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Codestral 2508 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Glimpse Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Codestral 2508 (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B