token.app › Compare › Codestral 2508 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Codestral 2508 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Codestral 2508 is 1.9× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Codestral 2508 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Input $/1M | $0.300 | $0.300 |
| Output $/1M | $0.900 | $2.50 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.450 | $0.850 |
| Context window | 256K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 205K | 66K |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Codestral 2508 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.450 vs $0.850 blended
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Codestral 2508 or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Codestral 2508 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Codestral 2508 cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Codestral 2508 is cheaper: $0.450 versus $0.850 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs $0.300. Output alone: $0.900 vs $2.50.
What context windows do Codestral 2508 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite have?
Codestral 2508: 256,000 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Codestral 2508 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Codestral 2508 is made by Mistral AI. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is made by Google.
Related comparisons