token.app › Compare › Codestral 2508 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Codestral 2508 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 8.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Codestral 2508 | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.300 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $0.900 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.450 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 256K | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Codestral 2508 if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.450 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Codestral 2508 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Codestral 2508 and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Codestral 2508 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.450 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.900 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Codestral 2508 and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Codestral 2508: 256,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Codestral 2508 and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Codestral 2508 is made by Mistral AI. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.