token.app › Compare › Command A vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Command A vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 80× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Command A | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $2.50 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $10.00 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $4.38 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 256K | 1M |
| Max output | 8K | 66K |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Command A if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $4.38 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Command A or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Command A and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Command A cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $4.38 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.50 vs $0.030. Output alone: $10.00 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Command A and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Command A and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Command A is made by Cohere. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.