token.app › Compare › Command R+ (08-2024) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Command R+ (08-2024) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 6.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Command R+ (08-2024)DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
ProviderCohereDeepSeek
Input $/1M$2.50$0.440
Output $/1M$10.00$1.32
Blended $/1M$4.38$0.660
Context window128K1.0M
Max output4K131K
ReleasedAug 2024Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Command R+ (08-2024) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.660 vs $4.38 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Command R+ (08-2024) or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Command R+ (08-2024) and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Command R+ (08-2024) cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper: $0.660 versus $4.38 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.50 vs $0.440. Output alone: $10.00 vs $1.32.
What context windows do Command R+ (08-2024) and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 have?
Command R+ (08-2024): 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Command R+ (08-2024) and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
Command R+ (08-2024) is made by Cohere. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons