token.app › Compare › Command R7B (12-2024) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Command R7B (12-2024) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Command R7B (12-2024) is 1.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Command R7B (12-2024)DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
ProviderCohereDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.037$0.090
Output $/1M$0.150$0.180
Blended $/1M$0.066$0.113
Context window128K1.0M
Max output4K384K
ReleasedDec 2024Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Command R7B (12-2024) if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.066 vs $0.113 blended
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Command R7B (12-2024) or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Command R7B (12-2024) and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Command R7B (12-2024) cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
Command R7B (12-2024) is cheaper: $0.066 versus $0.113 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.037 vs $0.090. Output alone: $0.150 vs $0.180.
What context windows do Command R7B (12-2024) and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 have?
Command R7B (12-2024): 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Command R7B (12-2024) and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
Command R7B (12-2024) is made by Cohere. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons