token.app › Compare › Command R7B (12-2024) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free)

Command R7B (12-2024) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free)

Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) is free to use, against $0.066 per million tokens. Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) accepts the larger context window (262K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Command R7B (12-2024)Xing4.0 29B A4B (free)
ProviderCohereXingchen agi
Input $/1M$0.037Free
Output $/1M$0.150Free
Blended $/1M$0.066Free
Context window128K262K
Max output4K236K
ReleasedDec 2024Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Command R7B (12-2024) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) if…
  • Costs less per token — Free vs $0.066 blended
  • Larger context window (262K)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Command R7B (12-2024) or Xing4.0 29B A4B (free)?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Command R7B (12-2024) and Xing4.0 29B A4B (free), so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Command R7B (12-2024) cheaper than Xing4.0 29B A4B (free)?
Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) is cheaper: Free versus $0.066 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.037 vs Free. Output alone: $0.150 vs Free.
What context windows do Command R7B (12-2024) and Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) have?
Command R7B (12-2024): 128,000 tokens. Xing4.0 29B A4B (free): 262,144 tokens.
Who makes Command R7B (12-2024) and Xing4.0 29B A4B (free)?
Command R7B (12-2024) is made by Cohere. Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) is made by Xingchen agi.
Related comparisons
Command R7B (12-2024) full details Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) full details Command R7B (12-2024) vs Flint (free) Command R7B (12-2024) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Command R7B (12-2024) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Command R7B (12-2024) vs Glimpse Command R7B (12-2024) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Command R7B (12-2024) vs Mercury 3