token.app › Compare › Command R7B (12-2024) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Command R7B (12-2024) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Command R7B (12-2024) is 13× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Command R7B (12-2024)Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ProviderCohereGoogle
Input $/1M$0.037$0.300
Output $/1M$0.150$2.50
Blended $/1M$0.066$0.850
Context window128K1.0M
Max output4K66K
ReleasedDec 2024Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Command R7B (12-2024) if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.066 vs $0.850 blended
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Command R7B (12-2024) or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Command R7B (12-2024) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Command R7B (12-2024) cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Command R7B (12-2024) is cheaper: $0.066 versus $0.850 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.037 vs $0.300. Output alone: $0.150 vs $2.50.
What context windows do Command R7B (12-2024) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite have?
Command R7B (12-2024): 128,000 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Command R7B (12-2024) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Command R7B (12-2024) is made by Cohere. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is made by Google.
Related comparisons
Command R7B (12-2024) full details Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite full details Command R7B (12-2024) vs Flint (free) Command R7B (12-2024) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Command R7B (12-2024) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Command R7B (12-2024) vs Glimpse Command R7B (12-2024) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Command R7B (12-2024) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B