token.app › Compare › Command R7B (12-2024) vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Command R7B (12-2024) vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Command R7B (12-2024) is 46× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Command R7B (12-2024)Gemini 3.6 Flash
ProviderCohereGoogle
Input $/1M$0.037$1.50
Output $/1M$0.150$7.50
Blended $/1M$0.066$3.00
Context window128K1.0M
Max output4K66K
ReleasedDec 2024Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Command R7B (12-2024) if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.066 vs $3.00 blended
Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Command R7B (12-2024) or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Command R7B (12-2024) and Gemini 3.6 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Command R7B (12-2024) cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Command R7B (12-2024) is cheaper: $0.066 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.037 vs $1.50. Output alone: $0.150 vs $7.50.
What context windows do Command R7B (12-2024) and Gemini 3.6 Flash have?
Command R7B (12-2024): 128,000 tokens. Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Command R7B (12-2024) and Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Command R7B (12-2024) is made by Cohere. Gemini 3.6 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons
Command R7B (12-2024) full details Gemini 3.6 Flash full details Command R7B (12-2024) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Command R7B (12-2024) vs Muse Spark 1.2 Command R7B (12-2024) vs Qwen3.8 Max Command R7B (12-2024) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Command R7B (12-2024) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Command R7B (12-2024) vs Inkling Small