token.app › Compare › Command R7B (12-2024) vs Inkling Small

Command R7B (12-2024) vs Inkling Small

Command R7B (12-2024) is 9.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling Small accepts the larger context window (524K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Command R7B (12-2024)Inkling Small
ProviderCohereThinkingmachines
Input $/1M$0.037$0.450
Output $/1M$0.150$1.20
Blended $/1M$0.066$0.637
Context window128K524K
Max output4K262K
ReleasedDec 2024Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Command R7B (12-2024) if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.066 vs $0.637 blended
Choose Inkling Small if…
  • Larger context window (524K)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Command R7B (12-2024) or Inkling Small?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Command R7B (12-2024) and Inkling Small, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Command R7B (12-2024) cheaper than Inkling Small?
Command R7B (12-2024) is cheaper: $0.066 versus $0.637 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.037 vs $0.450. Output alone: $0.150 vs $1.20.
What context windows do Command R7B (12-2024) and Inkling Small have?
Command R7B (12-2024): 128,000 tokens. Inkling Small: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Command R7B (12-2024) and Inkling Small?
Command R7B (12-2024) is made by Cohere. Inkling Small is made by Thinkingmachines.
Related comparisons
Command R7B (12-2024) full details Inkling Small full details Command R7B (12-2024) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Command R7B (12-2024) vs Muse Spark 1.2 Command R7B (12-2024) vs Qwen3.8 Max Command R7B (12-2024) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Command R7B (12-2024) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Command R7B (12-2024) vs Qwen3.7 Flash