token.app › Compare › Command R7B (12-2024) vs Mercury 3

Command R7B (12-2024) vs Mercury 3

Command R7B (12-2024) is 2.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Mercury 3 accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Command R7B (12-2024)Mercury 3
ProviderCohereInception
Input $/1M$0.037$0.100
Output $/1M$0.150$0.350
Blended $/1M$0.066$0.163
Context window128K1M
Max output4K131K
ReleasedDec 2024Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Command R7B (12-2024) if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.066 vs $0.163 blended
Choose Mercury 3 if…
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Command R7B (12-2024) or Mercury 3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Command R7B (12-2024) and Mercury 3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Command R7B (12-2024) cheaper than Mercury 3?
Command R7B (12-2024) is cheaper: $0.066 versus $0.163 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.037 vs $0.100. Output alone: $0.150 vs $0.350.
What context windows do Command R7B (12-2024) and Mercury 3 have?
Command R7B (12-2024): 128,000 tokens. Mercury 3: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Command R7B (12-2024) and Mercury 3?
Command R7B (12-2024) is made by Cohere. Mercury 3 is made by Inception.
Related comparisons
Command R7B (12-2024) full details Mercury 3 full details Command R7B (12-2024) vs Flint (free) Command R7B (12-2024) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Command R7B (12-2024) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Command R7B (12-2024) vs Glimpse Command R7B (12-2024) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Command R7B (12-2024) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B