token.app › Compare › R1 0528 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
R1 0528 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is 1.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| R1 0528 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Input $/1M | $0.500 | $0.300 |
| Output $/1M | $2.15 | $2.50 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.912 | $0.850 |
| Context window | 164K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 33K | 66K |
| Released | May 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
| GPQA Diamond | 76.3% | 83.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 66.4% | 71.1% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose R1 0528 if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if…
- Costs less per token — $0.850 vs $0.912 blended
- Higher GPQA Diamond (83.3% vs 76.3%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (71.1% vs 66.4%)
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, R1 0528 or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, R1 0528 leads on 0 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is R1 0528 cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper: $0.850 versus $0.912 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.500 vs $0.300. Output alone: $2.15 vs $2.50.
What context windows do R1 0528 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite have?
R1 0528: 163,840 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes R1 0528 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
R1 0528 is made by DeepSeek. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is made by Google.