token.app › Compare › R1 0528 vs Inkling Small
R1 0528 vs Inkling Small
Inkling Small leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Inkling Small is 1.4× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling Small accepts the larger context window (524K).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| R1 0528 | Inkling Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Thinkingmachines |
| Input $/1M | $0.500 | $0.450 |
| Output $/1M | $2.15 | $1.20 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.912 | $0.637 |
| Context window | 164K | 524K |
| Max output | 33K | 262K |
| Released | May 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
| GPQA Diamond | 76.3% | 88.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 66.4% | 90.0% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose R1 0528 if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Inkling Small if…
- Costs less per token — $0.637 vs $0.912 blended
- Higher GPQA Diamond (88.5% vs 76.3%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (90.0% vs 66.4%)
- Larger context window (524K)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, R1 0528 or Inkling Small?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, R1 0528 leads on 0 and Inkling Small leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is R1 0528 cheaper than Inkling Small?
Inkling Small is cheaper: $0.637 versus $0.912 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.500 vs $0.450. Output alone: $2.15 vs $1.20.
What context windows do R1 0528 and Inkling Small have?
R1 0528: 163,840 tokens. Inkling Small: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes R1 0528 and Inkling Small?
R1 0528 is made by DeepSeek. Inkling Small is made by Thinkingmachines.