token.app › Compare › R1 0528 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
R1 0528 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 17× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| R1 0528 | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.500 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $2.15 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.912 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 164K | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 66K |
| Released | May 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose R1 0528 if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.912 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, R1 0528 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both R1 0528 and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is R1 0528 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.912 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.500 vs $0.030. Output alone: $2.15 vs $0.130.
What context windows do R1 0528 and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
R1 0528: 163,840 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes R1 0528 and Qwen3.7 Flash?
R1 0528 is made by DeepSeek. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.