token.app › Compare › R1 0528 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
R1 0528 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Flash is 17× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| R1 0528 | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.500 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $2.15 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.912 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 164K | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 66K |
| Released | May 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
| GPQA Diamond | 76.3% | 82.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 66.4% | 86.7% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose R1 0528 if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.912 blended
- Higher GPQA Diamond (82.3% vs 76.3%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (86.7% vs 66.4%)
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, R1 0528 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, R1 0528 leads on 0 and Qwen3.7 Flash leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is R1 0528 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.912 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.500 vs $0.030. Output alone: $2.15 vs $0.130.
What context windows do R1 0528 and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
R1 0528: 163,840 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes R1 0528 and Qwen3.7 Flash?
R1 0528 is made by DeepSeek. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.