token.app › Compare › DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 1.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Beam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderDeepSeekReflection
Input $/1M$0.150$0.250
Output $/1M$0.600$1.00
Blended $/1M$0.262$0.438
Context window1.0M1.0M
Max output393K131K
ReleasedOct 2026Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $0.438 blended
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $0.438 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $0.250. Output alone: $0.600 vs $1.00.
What context windows do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details Beam 1.0 501B A23B full details DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Flint (free) DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Glimpse DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Mercury 3 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Moondream 3 Preview