token.app › Compare › DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Mercury 3

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Mercury 3

Mercury 3 is 1.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Mercury 3
ProviderDeepSeekInception
Input $/1M$0.150$0.100
Output $/1M$0.600$0.350
Blended $/1M$0.262$0.163
Context window1.0M1M
Max output393K131K
ReleasedOct 2026Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
Choose Mercury 3 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.163 vs $0.262 blended
FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Mercury 3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Mercury 3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 cheaper than Mercury 3?
Mercury 3 is cheaper: $0.163 versus $0.262 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $0.100. Output alone: $0.600 vs $0.350.
What context windows do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Mercury 3 have?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Mercury 3: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Mercury 3?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek. Mercury 3 is made by Inception.
Related comparisons
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details Mercury 3 full details DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Flint (free) DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Glimpse DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Moondream 3 Preview