token.app › Compare › Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 3.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderGoogleDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.300$0.150
Output $/1M$2.50$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.850$0.262
Context window33K1.0M
Max output8K393K
ReleasedOct 2025Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $0.850 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $0.850 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs $0.150. Output alone: $2.50 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): 32,768 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is made by Google. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons