token.app › Compare › Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs Mercury 3

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs Mercury 3

Mercury 3 is 5.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Mercury 3 accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Mercury 3
ProviderGoogleInception
Input $/1M$0.300$0.100
Output $/1M$2.50$0.350
Blended $/1M$0.850$0.163
Context window33K1M
Max output8K131K
ReleasedOct 2025Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Mercury 3 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.163 vs $0.850 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or Mercury 3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and Mercury 3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) cheaper than Mercury 3?
Mercury 3 is cheaper: $0.163 versus $0.850 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs $0.100. Output alone: $2.50 vs $0.350.
What context windows do Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and Mercury 3 have?
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): 32,768 tokens. Mercury 3: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and Mercury 3?
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is made by Google. Mercury 3 is made by Inception.
Related comparisons
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) full details Mercury 3 full details Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs Flint (free) Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs Glimpse Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B