token.app › Compare › Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 15× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderGoogleAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.300$0.030
Output $/1M$2.50$0.130
Blended $/1M$0.850$0.055
Context window33K1M
Max output8K66K
ReleasedOct 2025Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.850 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.850 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs $0.030. Output alone: $2.50 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): 32,768 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is made by Google. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons