token.app › Compare › Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs Qwen3.8 Max

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs Qwen3.8 Max

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is 3.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.8 Max accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Qwen3.8 Max
ProviderGoogleAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.300$2.00
Output $/1M$2.50$6.00
Blended $/1M$0.850$3.00
Context window33K1M
Max output8K131K
ReleasedOct 2025Aug 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.850 vs $3.00 blended
Choose Qwen3.8 Max if…
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or Qwen3.8 Max?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and Qwen3.8 Max, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max?
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is cheaper: $0.850 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs $2.00. Output alone: $2.50 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and Qwen3.8 Max have?
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): 32,768 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and Qwen3.8 Max?
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is made by Google. Qwen3.8 Max is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons