token.app › Compare › Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna is 1.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-5.6 Luna accepts the larger context window (1.1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch)GPT-5.6 Luna
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Input $/1M$0.375$0.200
Output $/1M$1.88$1.20
Blended $/1M$0.750$0.450
Context window1.0M1.1M
Max output66K128K
ReleasedAug 2026Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) if…
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.450 vs $0.750 blended
  • Larger context window (1.1M)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) or GPT-5.6 Luna?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) and GPT-5.6 Luna, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper: $0.450 versus $0.750 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.375 vs $0.200. Output alone: $1.88 vs $1.20.
What context windows do Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) and GPT-5.6 Luna have?
Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch): 1,048,576 tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens.
Who makes Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) and GPT-5.6 Luna?
Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) is made by Google. GPT-5.6 Luna is made by OpenAI.
Related comparisons
Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) full details GPT-5.6 Luna full details Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Flint (free) Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Glimpse Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B