token.app › Compare › Gemma 2 27B vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)
Gemma 2 27B vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)
Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is free to use, against $0.650 per million tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) accepts the larger context window (262K).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Gemma 2 27B | Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inclusionai | |
| Input $/1M | $0.650 | Free |
| Output $/1M | $0.650 | Free |
| Blended $/1M | $0.650 | Free |
| Context window | 8K | 262K |
| Max output | 2K | 33K |
| Released | Jul 2024 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Gemma 2 27B if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) if…
- Costs less per token — Free vs $0.650 blended
- Larger context window (262K)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemma 2 27B or Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemma 2 27B and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free), so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemma 2 27B cheaper than Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is cheaper: Free versus $0.650 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.650 vs Free. Output alone: $0.650 vs Free.
What context windows do Gemma 2 27B and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) have?
Gemma 2 27B: 8,192 tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free): 262,144 tokens.
Who makes Gemma 2 27B and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
Gemma 2 27B is made by Google. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is made by Inclusionai.