token.app › Compare › Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max
Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen3.8 Max leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Gemma 2 27B is 4.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.8 Max accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Gemma 2 27B | Qwen3.8 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | |
| Input $/1M | $0.650 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $0.650 | $6.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.650 | $3.00 |
| Context window | 8K | 1M |
| Max output | 2K | 131K |
| Released | Jul 2024 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | 92.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 1.4% | 99.4% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Gemma 2 27B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.650 vs $3.00 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.8 Max if…
- Higher GPQA Diamond (92.7% vs 36.5%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (99.4% vs 1.4%)
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemma 2 27B or Qwen3.8 Max?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Gemma 2 27B leads on 0 and Qwen3.8 Max leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Gemma 2 27B cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max?
Gemma 2 27B is cheaper: $0.650 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.650 vs $2.00. Output alone: $0.650 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Gemma 2 27B and Qwen3.8 Max have?
Gemma 2 27B: 8,192 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Gemma 2 27B and Qwen3.8 Max?
Gemma 2 27B is made by Google. Qwen3.8 Max is made by Alibaba.