token.app › Compare › gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 1.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
gpt-oss-120b (batch)Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.030$0.030
Output $/1M$0.136$0.130
Blended $/1M$0.056$0.055
Context window131K1M
Max output118K66K
ReleasedAug 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose gpt-oss-120b (batch) if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.056 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, gpt-oss-120b (batch) or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both gpt-oss-120b (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is gpt-oss-120b (batch) cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.056 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.030 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.136 vs $0.130.
What context windows do gpt-oss-120b (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
gpt-oss-120b (batch): 131,072 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes gpt-oss-120b (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash?
gpt-oss-120b (batch) is made by OpenAI. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons
gpt-oss-120b (batch) full details Qwen3.7 Flash full details gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs Flint (free) gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs Glimpse gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B