token.app › Compare › Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Phi 4

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Phi 4

Phi 4 leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Phi 4 is 4.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct accepts the larger context window (131K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Llama 3.1 70B InstructPhi 4
ProviderMetaMicrosoft
Input $/1M$0.400$0.070
Output $/1M$0.400$0.140
Blended $/1M$0.400$0.088
Context window131K16K
Max output16K16K
ReleasedJul 2024Jan 2025
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
GPQA Diamond 44.2% 56.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 3.6% 13.8%
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Llama 3.1 70B Instruct if…
  • Larger context window (131K)
Choose Phi 4 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.088 vs $0.400 blended
  • Higher GPQA Diamond (56.1% vs 44.2%)
  • Higher OTIS Mock AIME (13.8% vs 3.6%)
  • Newer model (released Jan 2025)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or Phi 4?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct leads on 0 and Phi 4 leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Llama 3.1 70B Instruct cheaper than Phi 4?
Phi 4 is cheaper: $0.088 versus $0.400 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.400 vs $0.070. Output alone: $0.400 vs $0.140.
What context windows do Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Phi 4 have?
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct: 131,072 tokens. Phi 4: 16,384 tokens.
Who makes Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Phi 4?
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is made by Meta. Phi 4 is made by Microsoft.
Related comparisons
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct full details Phi 4 full details Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.2 Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Qwen3.8 Max Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Inkling Small